I don’t know what the forum thinks, personally I think he’s more likely to be a scam artist than not.I would love to know what the forum thinks about Joe Dispenza.
And what I mean by scam artist isn’t that he doesn’t believe in what he teaches (he may very well be fully convinced), but rather that what he’s selling simply doesn’t work in the way he thinks it works in.
Personally, I don’t believe anyone’s story is that important. A story is what the storyteller wants it to be. He skips the facts he doesn’t like, embellishes some of the existing facts, and so on.If you don't know him, the story of Dispenza is important.
Ask yourself — how do you know what Dispenza’s story is?
Isn’t it because that’s what he SAYS it is?
I mean, how do you know that according to several doctors he would never walk again?
Have those doctors been interviewed?
Have his childhood friends, work collegues, and so on been interviewed?
Ask yourself, who has real interest to control the narrative of Dispenza’s story? Isn’t it Dispenza himself?
No one else can possibly match HIS level of interest. For a journalist, it’s just a job. For him, it’s his livelihood. This means his story is always skewed towards what he wants it to be.
I could very well claim that doctors diagnosed me with OCD, put me on pills, and told me I’ll be on them my entire life. And then through my mindset osmosis technique, I’ve overcome OCD 100%, got rid of the pills and never had another OCD thought again. While the real facts are that they diagnosed me with OCD, tested pills, and said I might need them my entire life, i tapered off the pills and gained 98% control over the OCD with CBT and mental training.
Can you see how much more powerful the first version is? And it’s not exactly a lie — it’s a good story, embellished at the right points, written with some flair and flamboyance. That’s what a story needs to be.
If I go to a professional journalist and tell him my factual, non-embellished story, he’ll tell me “wait a minute, we can’t say it like that… it doesn’t sound good! A proper story needs a clear beginning and end, and a clean progression.
Therefore why should I buy his story or any story for that matter? I’ll only buy it to the extent that what he says makes sense and is backed by other evidence and things that I already know and accept as true.
scientific studies
The only scientific studies are double blind experiments with rigorous methodological controls. Dispenza has nothing of that sort. I’ve worked in scientific research briefly for 1 year, I even have an article to my name published in a reputable journal. And I know first hand how EASY it is to get the results to be what YOU want them to be, if you just have a little leniency on the methodology. That’s all it takes. And you can prove that breathing Himalayan air cures cancer!
So he paid guys you know to appear on their podcasts. That’s how it works. Maybe he didn’t pay them directly, but he paid someone to secure those interviews for him. It’s called manufacturing credibility, which is an extremely valuable skill, maybe I should create a thread about it.Dispenza has been interviewed by too many people I respect, such as Ed Mylett, Jay Sethi, Tom Bilyeu, Lewis Howes... among many many others. He also launched a documentary series explaining the science behind the method, has several best-selling books...
Noooooooo, this can’t possibly be true. Is it true @BizyDad ? You’re one of those weed smoking kumbaya yogis that dress in pink clothes and sandals?PS: I'd especially like to know what you think @BizyDad , I read you're a big fan of manifestation haha
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.