- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 74
Rep Bank
$415
$415
User Power: 77%
As some of you may know, I am a web app developer and am about 80% of the way through creating a website/blog/cms/e-commerce platform that will out-perform, out-feature and is much more flexible & easier to use than anything else I have seen (just some background so you know where I'm coming from).
I also sell products online and am about to release a new range of products that will require a typical online shop interface. These are almost ready to sell now so I decided to temporarily use a popular open source shopping cart & bought a decent looking theme for it with the intention of migrating to my system when it is ready.
The cart software was free, looks to be well written & works well (typical speed & ease of use issues aside).
The premium theme I bought has many rave reviews from its users & has generated revenue in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for its creator. (Note to self - write & sell themes.)
/** Rant start */
On inspection, the theme is absolute crap technically. I was simply stunned when I looked at the code.
It causes hundreds of html & css validation errors, contains many obsolete html attributes (even though I have the latest version which was released very recently), is very disorganised, completely un-commented, extremely bloated & ignores many coding best practice guidelines. In short, the product works and actually looks pretty good but the core is rotten.
/** Rant end */
I'm not at all concerned about this from my own usage point of view as it is only a temporary quick fix but it got me thinking:
Is it worth putting in the extra time, effort and expense needed to create a product you can be proud of or is it better to quickly throw something together for a quick profit even if you know it is rubbish as long as it looks ok & does the job? Not meaning being a perfectionist to the nth degree, just talking about a good, solid product.
In a situation where the customer probably won't be able to determine the difference which is more important - perceived quality (even if the product is poorly made) or real quality? Either way, why?
I'm not talking specifically about web related products - rather, any & all products (and services), physical or digital. I would be interested in all your thoughts & opinions about this either way from a business (not egocentric) perspective...
I also sell products online and am about to release a new range of products that will require a typical online shop interface. These are almost ready to sell now so I decided to temporarily use a popular open source shopping cart & bought a decent looking theme for it with the intention of migrating to my system when it is ready.
The cart software was free, looks to be well written & works well (typical speed & ease of use issues aside).
The premium theme I bought has many rave reviews from its users & has generated revenue in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for its creator. (Note to self - write & sell themes.)
/** Rant start */
On inspection, the theme is absolute crap technically. I was simply stunned when I looked at the code.
It causes hundreds of html & css validation errors, contains many obsolete html attributes (even though I have the latest version which was released very recently), is very disorganised, completely un-commented, extremely bloated & ignores many coding best practice guidelines. In short, the product works and actually looks pretty good but the core is rotten.
/** Rant end */
I'm not at all concerned about this from my own usage point of view as it is only a temporary quick fix but it got me thinking:
Is it worth putting in the extra time, effort and expense needed to create a product you can be proud of or is it better to quickly throw something together for a quick profit even if you know it is rubbish as long as it looks ok & does the job? Not meaning being a perfectionist to the nth degree, just talking about a good, solid product.
In a situation where the customer probably won't be able to determine the difference which is more important - perceived quality (even if the product is poorly made) or real quality? Either way, why?
I'm not talking specifically about web related products - rather, any & all products (and services), physical or digital. I would be interested in all your thoughts & opinions about this either way from a business (not egocentric) perspective...
Dislike ads? Become a Fastlane member:
Subscribe today and surround yourself with winners and millionaire mentors, not those broke friends who only want to drink beer and play video games. :-)
Membership Required: Upgrade to Expose Nearly 1,000,000 Posts
Ready to Unleash the Millionaire Entrepreneur in You?
Become a member of the Fastlane Forum, the private community founded by best-selling author and multi-millionaire entrepreneur MJ DeMarco. Since 2007, MJ DeMarco has poured his heart and soul into the Fastlane Forum, helping entrepreneurs reclaim their time, win their financial freedom, and live their best life.
With more than 39,000 posts packed with insights, strategies, and advice, you’re not just a member—you’re stepping into MJ’s inner-circle, a place where you’ll never be left alone.
Become a member and gain immediate access to...
- Active Community: Ever join a community only to find it DEAD? Not at Fastlane! As you can see from our home page, life-changing content is posted dozens of times daily.
- Exclusive Insights: Direct access to MJ DeMarco’s daily contributions and wisdom.
- Powerful Networking Opportunities: Connect with a diverse group of successful entrepreneurs who can offer mentorship, collaboration, and opportunities.
- Proven Strategies: Learn from the best in the business, with actionable advice and strategies that can accelerate your success.
"You are the average of the five people you surround yourself with the most..."
Who are you surrounding yourself with? Surround yourself with millionaire success. Join Fastlane today!
Join Today