Membership Required: Upgrade to Expose Nearly 1,000,000 Posts
Ready to Unleash the Millionaire Entrepreneur in You?
Become a member of the Fastlane Forum, the private community founded by best-selling author and multi-millionaire entrepreneur MJ DeMarco. Since 2007, MJ DeMarco has poured his heart and soul into the Fastlane Forum, helping entrepreneurs achieve reclaim their time, win their financial freedom, and live their best life.
With more than 39,000 posts packed with insights, strategies, and advice, you’re not just a member—you’re stepping into MJ’s inner-circl, a place where you’ll never be left alone.
Become a member and gain immediate access to...
- Active Community: Ever join a community only to find it DEAD? Not at Fastlane! As you can see from our home page, life-changing content is posted dozens of times daily.
- Exclusive Insights: Direct access to MJ DeMarco’s daily contributions and wisdom.
- Powerful Networking Opportunities: Connect with a diverse group of successful entrepreneurs who can offer mentorship, collaboration, and opportunities.
- Proven Strategies: Learn from the best in the business, with actionable advice and strategies that can accelerate your success.
"You are the average of the five people you surround yourself with the most..."
Who are you surrounding yourself with? Surround yourself with millionaire success. Join Fastlane today!
Join Today
For years I've been saying that the bigger/more wealthy an individual gets, the more "control" they have over things.
This is intentional-- the middle class are fond of saying "I'm the owner of ________".
Really rich/wealthy folks don't say this. They don't WANT others to know how much they own.
As an individual becomes more and more wealthy, they often shift their focus from $$$ to CONTROL.
In other words, it's not as important for them to personally "own" something-- it's more important to "control" it.
Examples:
-A middle class person may "own" their home, and may even "own" a vacation home or two.
-A rich/wealthy person may not "own" any of the homes they live in (they may have many). A separate LLC or other corporate entity "owns" these properties, shielding the wealthy person from frivolous lawsuits.
*******
-A middle class person may "own" the car they drive (most do).
-A wealthy person may not own the cars in their garage. It's more likely that these vehicles are owned by a corporate entity (for liability/tax reasons), OR-- since brand new cars depreciate over time and in most cases are a poor investment, the car may just be leased-- the wealthy person never intends to own them. The lease is often paid by a corporate entity, and not directly by the person that drives it.
*********************
The ultimate form of control is law. If you want something done that benefits you, having it made into law makes it easier to accomplish.
So it stands to reason that the mega-wealthy (who understand and appreciate the advantages of CONTROL) are the people most interested in influencing LAW to do things that favor them personally.
The world's wealthiest people have an enormous influence on politics (politicians are our law makers). Wealthy people influence law by getting "their own people" elected-- politicians who will "pay them back" with favorable legislation -- or, even better-- someone who has the same goals/principles as the wealthy person, and by "voting their principles" also endorses/supports the wealthy person's agenda.
It is with this in mind that I present the following MASSIVE change in American control systems (aka "politics"):
Court eases business, union election spending rule - Yahoo! News
PLEASE NO POLITICAL COMMENTS-- that is not the intent of this thread.
I'm posting to ask:
1. Have you made the shift from OWNING to CONTROLLING?
2. If so, WHAT have you done? HOW have you done it?
3. What changes/adjustments could you make to your PLAN to benefit from the massive change just approved by the US Supreme Court? (note to international readers: You too could structure your PLAN to benefit from these changes, if you plan on doing business in the US. How/what would *you* do?)
-Russ H.
This is intentional-- the middle class are fond of saying "I'm the owner of ________".
Really rich/wealthy folks don't say this. They don't WANT others to know how much they own.
As an individual becomes more and more wealthy, they often shift their focus from $$$ to CONTROL.
In other words, it's not as important for them to personally "own" something-- it's more important to "control" it.
Examples:
-A middle class person may "own" their home, and may even "own" a vacation home or two.
-A rich/wealthy person may not "own" any of the homes they live in (they may have many). A separate LLC or other corporate entity "owns" these properties, shielding the wealthy person from frivolous lawsuits.
*******
-A middle class person may "own" the car they drive (most do).
-A wealthy person may not own the cars in their garage. It's more likely that these vehicles are owned by a corporate entity (for liability/tax reasons), OR-- since brand new cars depreciate over time and in most cases are a poor investment, the car may just be leased-- the wealthy person never intends to own them. The lease is often paid by a corporate entity, and not directly by the person that drives it.
*********************
The ultimate form of control is law. If you want something done that benefits you, having it made into law makes it easier to accomplish.
So it stands to reason that the mega-wealthy (who understand and appreciate the advantages of CONTROL) are the people most interested in influencing LAW to do things that favor them personally.
The world's wealthiest people have an enormous influence on politics (politicians are our law makers). Wealthy people influence law by getting "their own people" elected-- politicians who will "pay them back" with favorable legislation -- or, even better-- someone who has the same goals/principles as the wealthy person, and by "voting their principles" also endorses/supports the wealthy person's agenda.
It is with this in mind that I present the following MASSIVE change in American control systems (aka "politics"):
Court eases business, union election spending rule - Yahoo! News
PLEASE NO POLITICAL COMMENTS-- that is not the intent of this thread.
I'm posting to ask:
1. Have you made the shift from OWNING to CONTROLLING?
2. If so, WHAT have you done? HOW have you done it?
3. What changes/adjustments could you make to your PLAN to benefit from the massive change just approved by the US Supreme Court? (note to international readers: You too could structure your PLAN to benefit from these changes, if you plan on doing business in the US. How/what would *you* do?)
-Russ H.
Dislike ads? Become a Fastlane member:
Subscribe today and surround yourself with winners and millionare mentors, not those broke friends who only want to drink beer and play video games. :-)
dup_taqis:
