the need isn't securityI am not necessarily arguing your approach is wrong. But trying to take it to the process level.
The need is security, not a post-nup. The solution could be lots of different things.
Our solution has been developing so that either partner could thrive without the other, whether the split is involuntary, the metaphorical bus, or voluntary, a new hookers and blow habit.
I can take care of me just fine the only security I need is that he needs to take care of his kids. (unless I have already made it in which case I wouldn't even need him to do that) I already know that I will always take care of them. even if I got half(of my own money LOL) I would be secure. once his money is gone its gone divorced together or not... I am not concerned about that beyond the obligations in the post nup.
he is already secure. he doesn't need me for anything. he can take care of himself and if I were gone he could pay to have someone else take care of the kids... and they are almost at the point that neither one of us will have to take care of them.
the post nup is purely a strategic and protective move.
Dislike ads? Remove them and support the forum:
Subscribe to Fastlane Insiders.