Okay, on a more serious note, I honestly think you under-estimate what it takes to start, grow and manage a very successful company and -- if you really think you could have been as successful at starting McDonalds or Google -- you probably overestimate your ability to do it.
I've held senior positions at and managed 8-figure P&Ls for three billion-dollar companies; I've been involved in two billion-dollar acquisitions (one from each side of the table); and I've started my own business that, at its peak, generated 8-figures in revenue per year (and am two years into the next one that I hope does much better). So, I've met the people who have started and managed large companies, I have a pretty good understanding of what it takes to manage a large company and I know what's involved in starting and growing a small company.
To start a billion dollar company is easy -- it starts just like any other company, with an idea. But, the difference between the company that fails after 12 months and the company that grows to billions in revenue has nothing to do with the idea that the company was conceived upon. The difference is that the billion-dollar company made hundreds or thousands of small, but very good, decisions along the way. They hired the right people, brought in the right advisors, focused on the right customers, built the right product, managed their cash flow, acquired assets appropriately, positioned themselves in their market, had appropriate relationships with partners/vendors/competitors at all stages of growth, managed their margins to the industry, optimally traded equity for resources, optimally leveraged debt, marketed to their buyer demographic correctly, etc.
These hundreds/thousands of decisions are what differentiate the billion-dollar companies from the failed companies. And what differentiated the billion-dollar companies from the million-dollar companies that might have had the same -- or very similar -- ideas upon which they were founded. In my experience, those who start successful companies are very good decision makers. They don't get 50% of the decisions right -- they get 90% of the decisions right. Sure, some are very lucky (right place, right time), but most are very attuned to their market, their competition, their customers, their suppliers, etc., and that's what makes them successful.
There's a reason why someone who graduates from Stanford or Harvard business school is statistically many, many, many times more likely to succeed starting a business than someone who doesn't go to college. It's not because they have better ideas; it's because they have better relationships, better access to capital, better decision-making skills, better networks of potential advisors, employees and partners, etc.
And again, I've worked for/with those who have started ultra-successful businesses, and my experience tells me that they are different than the average business owner. They are (typically) smarter, more focused, better at making decisions and better at hiring the right people at the right time. "Superpowers"? Nope. But, certainly a special affinity for the particular business/market/product that they are selling.
Like I said, my current business has been very successful. It's built on the same exact idea that thousands of other people around the world have built their businesses as well. But, I'm making more money than most. How can that be if we all started with the same idea? In my view, it's that I've executed better than most. My competitive advantage wasn't my idea (we all had the same idea) -- it was how I implemented (executed) that idea. Had I executed better (as some have done), I'd make more money. If I executed worse, I'd make less money.
So, you can go on believing that you could execute as well as those who start billion-dollar companies (if only you had the idea first!), but based on my experience, until you do it, I'm skeptical. And I think you very much either under-estimate the skill it takes or over-estimate your own skill.